De Nieuwe Ster, October 9, 2026, from our editorial staff Translation: Ineke/Diana City Hall backs Aesthetics Committee; Pierre Rieu has been warned. If Rieu insists on his Christmas decorations, the municipality will take enforcement action. City Hall is firmly backing the Aesthetics and Monuments Committee regarding the issue of the Christmas lights—complete with a bow—that Pierre Rieu intends to hang at the Derlon. Alderman Hubert Mackus (CDA) is dismissing an initiative proposal put forward by party colleague and faction leader Gabriëlle Heine (CDA) and co-sponsor D66. Heine had drafted the proposal to immediately create more leeway for business owners to decorate their premises for Christmas. Heine’s move was an immediate response to the recent ruling by the Aesthetics Committee, which holds that Rieu must choose between either the lights or the bow on the Derlon’s façade. Using both simultaneously would be "excessive"—an excess that would compromise the "recognizability" of the hotel building's architecture. Heine had previously stated: "Excess is being portrayed as something negative, whereas—provided the right conditions are met—it can be a huge asset to the city. Just look at major cities like London or Paris." Heine invested a great deal of time in developing the proposal, but is now facing a resounding “no”. Alderman Mackus has now issued a negative opinion regarding Heine's proposal. A clear warning is being issued from City Hall: "This means that applications, requests, and initiatives for Christmas and winter festive lighting will be assessed based on existing regulations, policy frameworks, and assessment criteria. Furthermore, standard practices regarding implementation, supervision, and enforcement remain in effect." It is noteworthy that the language used in the official response appears to have been generated by AI; the municipality uses Copilot. See for yourself: "While we understand that the proposal aims to create more scope for entrepreneurs—thereby contributing to the city center's appeal during the winter season—we also note that certain aspects of the proposed criteria have not yet been sufficiently fleshed out to allow for consistent, objective, and enforceable application; consequently, the proposal fails to meet its intended objectives." "As a result, the implications for permitting, supervision, and enforcement, environmental quality, heritage values, feasibility, and equal treatment remain insufficiently clear. Several proposed assessment criteria contain open-ended standards that require further elaboration before they can be applied in a careful and unambiguous manner. This could lead to differences in interpretation, implementation issues, and disputes regarding the application of the rules, potentially undermining uniformity, cohesion, recognizability, and the quality of the streetscape." "Furthermore, the organizational, legal, and financial consequences of the proposed changes have not yet been adequately mapped out." City Hall advises the council to hold off on adopting new policy: "We therefore advise your council not to adopt the proposal at this time, but rather to first allow for an exploratory and participatory process in which the possibilities, consequences, and preferences are carefully identified." Mackus intends to revisit the rules regarding Christmas lighting in 2027. They could then come into effect for the 2027/2028 season.

October 10, 2026, advertisement: At Hotel Derlon, we believe that no one should have to be alone at Christmas. Are you on your own, or do you know someone who will be spending Christmas alone? We would love to welcome you—Pierre Rieu and the Derlon team. On Boxing Day, we are once again setting the table for people who would otherwise be alone. Come join us and enjoy a 3-course dinner, a warm and welcoming atmosphere, and, of course, live music. Reservations (for individuals only) can be made at info@derlon.com. Price: €59.95. Welcome aperitif at 6:30 PM; dinner starts at 7:00 PM.

To go back to Pierre Rieu, page 8, click HERE.

Sharing an October 14, 2026 article, an update on the Christmas decorations policy in Maastricht, Netherlands, from De Nieuwe Ster, by Maurice Ubags. Translation Diana. Good news for Pierre Rieu: He will be able to keep his Christmas decorations for Hotel Derlon as Maastricht relaxes rules for this year! CDA Party Chair Gabriëlle Heine, together with D66, won the battle over Christmas decorations in the city. All Christmas Decorations Now Permitted. The motion proposed by both parties to give business owners more leeway to decorate their properties for Christmas ultimately secured a comfortable majority. The left-wing parties, in particular, persistently tried to derail the proposal with frequent interruptions. Their efforts failed. The result of adopting the initiative proposal is that the municipal executive will immediately begin accepting all Christmas decorations. Alderman Hubert Mackus of the CDA: “There isn’t enough time to start working with permits. That means we’ll take the policy as currently established by the council as our starting point.” In practice, this means we will tolerate them. No enforcement, no fines. It would be strange if we, as the executive board, were to continue enforcing the old policy, while the council is now voting in favor of a different one.” Mardge Pascaud of D66: “Maastricht could certainly shine a little brighter in the winter. It comes down to how we, as a city, deal with initiative—do we have confidence in entrepreneurs? We want to give entrepreneurs more leeway. Not a free pass, but clear guidelines. This proposal doesn’t leave everything up in the air, either. For example, the preservation of historic facades remains a requirement. Lighting must not be bright or flashing. Lights must be turned off between 1 a.m. and 6 a.m. The Building Standards Board retains its oversight role. “D66 doesn't want a victory on paper, but real clarity. Careful consideration is important, but we want to avoid waiting another year.” None of those requirements will be enforced for the upcoming Christmas season, because there simply isn’t enough time to have them all reviewed by the Aesthetics Committee and approved through a permit process. In practice, this means that every business owner can do whatever they want. Alderman Hubert Mackus ultimately confirmed this. Luc Callemeijn spoke on behalf of his coalition party, GroenLinks, and also on behalf of Volt. He was the most vocal opponent of relaxing the rules. “We want to express our appreciation for the city’s collective lighting. It is the result of a special collaboration between business owners, the municipality, and Centrum Management Maastricht. We must cherish that quality. We have spoken with many business owners ourselves. They are concerned. The question is just how widely this desire to relax the rules is supported by business owners.” Callemeijn: “We understand that the business associations will issue a statement later this week. Let’s wait for that. For that reason, we do not recognize the urgency either.” Callemeijn also brought up Volt and M:OED during the meeting. From a historical perspective, the position taken by the VVD represents a complete reversal. During the era of John Aarts of the VVD, the VVD and Centrum Management Maastricht were almost always on the same page. While Centrum Management is now opposed to relaxing the rules, Council Member Jean-Pierre van Wissem was in favor. “The VVD stands for fewer rules and more room for individual initiative. Private lighting cannot be viewed in isolation from public spaces. “Private lighting must be coordinated with public lighting. Unity is strength, but not everything has to be the same. The VVD supports that goal of the initiative. We see an opportunity for improvement.” The SPM also supported the CDA and D66. “Politics is for the people and for our city. What is the experience? The experience for our city and our visitors—that’s an overall picture of emotions. Dare to take the plunge. Make room for a festive Christmas,” said John Steijns. The PvdA opposes giving entrepreneurs more leeway: “The approach from 2012 is still relevant enough. How do we assess concepts such as a professional lighting plan, a cohesive theme, or a visual focal point?” The PvdA believes that no decision can be made at this time. The party opted to follow the municipal executive’s line: make no changes. Jo Smeets: “I don’t want to spend more than a minute on this. And I’ll speak very slowly. Our proposal is simple. Let’s allow the Christmas bow next year. Let’s call that ‘customization.’ You know, that term the city always uses for itself when the rules get in the way. So for now, let’s go with the initiative proposal, and then next year we can let the alderman figure out what the new rules should be for 2027/2028. Merry Christmas to everyone, in advance." 50PLUS: “What kind of council do we want to be? We’re going from one incident to the next. Where is this council’s consistent approach? Intratuin? Are we going to turn a blind eye? We had the same discussion last year about the Christmas bow as we’re having now. These aren’t sudden situations. Why didn’t anyone put this on the agenda sooner? Explain that to me. Now we’re turning a blind eye again. Maastricht is becoming a city that turns a blind eye. “Congratulations, city government,” I’d say.”